Government protects Industry, violates forests

Peaceful Parks Coalition
For Immediate Release

Implementation of Ontario Forest Accord Proves Environmentalists' Worst
Fears

Toronto, November 27, 2002 - Signed in 1999, the Conservative government
touted the Ontario Forest Accord as an historic agreement that sets out a
strategy for increasing protected areas and increasing timber production.

Notably, The Accord secures the industry's wood supply before further land
withdrawals are made to expand Ontario's parks and protected areas. It
guarantees the industry no long-term reduction in wood supply, no increase
in the costs of wood supply, and potential exemptions of regulations
designed to protect biodiversity in areas where tree plantations are
established - tree plantations increase wood supply by growing more wood
from less land in less time and are also associated with the manipulation of
tree genetics. Without secure wood supply, compensation will be payable to
the forest industry where withdrawals or reallocations of public lands may
be necessary or desirable for public interest reasons.

"The Ontario government is now implementing this agreement and what we're
seeing is a push to take every last stick out of the forest," says AnnaMaria
Valastro of the Peaceful Parks Coalition. "The landscape will be so
degraded that even if we were to successfully increase protected areas, they
would be islands of green in a sea of industrial activity."

To increase wood supply, the Ontario government is currently considering
utilizing more of the whole tree, therefore leaving less organic matter on
the ground that could be recycled into soil and nutrients; cutting into
buffer zones designed to protect riparian areas and wildlife habitat;
increase crown land available for the production of tree plantations; and it
will encourage the cutting of older forests first to increase yield. The
instrument for benchmarking the fibre requirements of Ontario's forest
industry has been arbitrarily set on current usage with no consideration for
forest ecology. "It is a completely ad hoc process," says Valastro.

The Ontario Forest Accord constitutes a perverse incentive with respect to
the conservation of biological diversity - one must destroy the natural
environment in order to protect the natural environment, and constrains
future governments, because of considerable costs consequences, from
exercising decisions in the public interest as is appropriate at that time.

The Accord was written and signed without a transparent public process. For
example, it was designed and agreed to by only a few government officials
and selected industry and environmental representatives. It was never
posted on the Environmental Bills of Rights Registry for public comment.
"We will be asking that the government's wood supply strategies and the
Ontario Forest Accord be subjected to a Full Environmental Assessment. Such
sweeping regulations cannot be reflected by only a few hand picked
interests."

-30-

For more information, contact AnnaMaria Valastro, Peaceful Parks Coalition,
at 416.537.3212

Ontario Forest Accord:

1. www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/oll/ofaab/accord.html

Peaceful Parks Coalition
P.O. Box 326, Station B
Toronto, Ontario M5T 2W2
ppc@peacefulparks.org
www.peacefulparks.org